December 20, 2012 |
Lawrence Lessig's
Republic Lost
documents the corrosive effect of money on our political process.
Lessig persuasively makes the case that we are witnessing the loss of
our republican form of government, as politicians increasingly represent
those who fund their campaigns, rather than our citizens.
Anthony Everitt's
Rise of Rome is
fascinating history and a great read. It tells the story of ancient
Rome, from its founding (circa 750 BCE) to the fall of the Roman
Republic (circa 45 BCE).
When read together, striking
parallels emerge -- between our failings and the failings that destroyed
the Roman Republic. As with Rome just before the Republic's fall,
America has seen:
1 -- Staggering Increase in the Cost of Elections, with Dubious Campaign Funding Sources:Our
2012 election reportedly cost $3 billion. All of it was raised from
private sources - often creating the appearance, or the reality, that
our leaders are beholden to special interest groups. During the late
Roman Republic, elections became staggeringly expensive, with equally
deplorable results.
Caesar reportedly borrowed so heavily for one political campaign, he feared he would be ruined, if not elected.
2 -- Politics as the Road to Personal Wealth:
During the late Roman Republic period, one of the main roads to wealth
was holding public office, and exploiting such positions to accumulate
personal wealth. As Lessig notes: Congressman, Senators and their staffs
leverage their government service to move to private sector positions -
that pay three to ten times their government compensation. Given this
financial arrangement, "Their focus is therefore not so much on the
people who sent them to Washington. Their focus is instead on those who
will make them rich." (
Republic Lost)
3 -- Continuous War: A national state of security arises, distracting attention from domestic challenges with foreign wars.
Similar to the late Roman Republic, the US - for the past 100 years --
has either been fighting a war, recovering from a war, or preparing for a
new war: WW I (1917-18), WW II (1941-1945), Cold War (1947-1991),
Korean War (1950-1953), Vietnam (1953-1975), Gulf War (1990-1991),
Afghanistan (2001-ongoing), and Iraq (2003-2011). And, this list is far
from
complete.
4 -- Foreign Powers Lavish Money/Attention on the Republic's Leaders:
Foreign wars lead to growing influence, by foreign powers and
interests, on the Republic's political leaders -- true for Rome and true
for us. In the past century, foreign embassies, agents and lobbyists
have proliferated in our nation's capital. As one specific example: A
foreign businessman donated $100 million to
Bill Clinton's
various activities. Clinton "opened doors" for him, and sometimes acted
in ways contrary to stated American interests and foreign policy.
5 -- Profits Made Overseas Shape the Republic's Internal Policies:As
the fortunes of Rome's aristocracy increasingly derived from foreign
lands, Roman policy was shaped to facilitate these fortunes. American
billionaires and corporations increasingly influence our elections. In
many cases, they are only nominally American - with interests not
aligned with those of the American public. For example, Fox News is part
of international media group News Corp., with over $30 billion in
revenues worldwide. Is Fox News' jingoism a product of News Corp.'s
non-U.S. interests?
6 -- Collapse of the Middle Class:
In the period just before the Roman Republic's fall, the Roman middle
class was crushed -- destroyed by cheap overseas slave labor. In our own
day, we've witnessed rising
income inequality, a stagnating middle class, and the loss of American jobs to overseas workers who are paid less and have fewer rights.
7 -- Gerrymandering:Rome's late Republic used various methods to reduce the power of common citizens. The GOP has so effectively
gerrymandered
Congressional districts that, even though House Republican candidates
received only about 48 percent of the popular vote in the 2012 election
-- they ended up with the majority (53 percent) of the seats.
8 -- Loss of the Spirit of Compromise:
The Roman Republic, like ours, relied on a system of checks and
balances. Compromise is needed for this type of system to function. In
the end, the Roman Republic lost that spirit of compromise, with
politics increasingly polarized between
Optimates (the rich, entrenched elites) and Populares (the common people). Sound familiar? Compromise is in noticeably short supply in our own time also.
For example, "There were more filibusters between 2009 and 2010 than there were in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s combined."
About the Author: Steven Strauss was
founding Managing Director of the Center for Economic Transformation at
the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). Steven was
one of the NYC leads for Applied Sciences NYC, NYC BigApps and many
other initiatives to foster job growth, innovation and entrepreneurship.
He is an Advanced Leadership Fellow at Harvard University for 2012. In
2010, Steven was selected as a member of the Silicon Alley 100 in NYC.
He has a Ph.D. in Management from Yale University, and over 20 years'
private sector work experience. Geographically, Steven has worked in the
US, Asia, Europe and the Middle East.
No comments:
Post a Comment