It’s Time for Obama to Fire DeMarco—Will He?
Federal Housing Finance Agency Acting Director Edward DeMarco. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac won’t reduce the principal of underwater homeowners—FHFA head Edward DeMarco made that official yesterday. Despite the fact that FHFA analysts concluded this week that forgiving certain mortgage debts could save public money, DeMarco said yesterday he would not allow it because of the “costs and risks”—he is particularly concerned that people might strategically default to qualify for help.
This is a nonsense argument—as Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner pointed out in a letter [pdf] to DeMarco yesterday, strategic default is an incredibly risky strategy:
A borrower who defaults cannot be certain that he
and she will obtain a HAMP modification, much less…principal reduction.
Therefore, a borrower would take a substantial risk be deliberately
defaulting: they would have to choose to damage their credit for years
to come and perjure themselves on the chance that they would be found
eligible for the program.
Few, if any, borrowers strategically defaulted to
take advantage of mortgage servicer relief under the $25 billion
settlement struck in March…
In fact, the percentage of current underwater
borrowers moving to delinquent status, or the roll rate, shrank to 2.8%
in June from 3.1% in February, a trend consistent since before a deal
was reached with mortgage servicers to settle past foreclosure abuses.…
“Fitch views strategic defaults as an ongoing
concern,” the credit ratings agency said in a report Monday. “That said,
there does not appear to be any sign yet of a material change in the
behavior of underwater borrowers attempting to strategically default to
qualify for a reduction.”
Democratic critics—who have for months been hammering DeMarco for his obstinacy—are now focusing on his apparently ideological opposition to principal write-downs. “We are five years into the housing crisis, and FHFA remains paralyzed by the fear that somehow homeowners innocently trapped in the worst economy since the Great Depression are going to weasel out of paying every penny on their mortgage that they could,” said Representative Brad Miller in a statement.
In a way, DeMarco is making his position more untenable by opposing write-downs on ideological grounds. That’s not something that can be easily rectified—as opposed to having complaints about technical aspects of the program.
Obama has the power to replace DeMarco whenever he wants. Since DeMarco is only Acting Director of the FHFA, Obama can simply nominate a permanent one. That person would have to clear a Senate confirmation vote, which won’t happen this year (but might be an interesting fight to have in an election year anyhow). Moreover, Obama could use a recess appointment to install someone else.
Progressives have been pushing hard on the White House to replace DeMarco—and now that DeMarco has dug himself in, why not do that, especially now that he has gone through the motions of considering and then denying write-downs.
Many progressive critics of the administration correctly note that for years, the administration opposed principal reduction too, and has only recently come around to it. So was that a true policy evolution, or political theatre in an election year? Forcing in an FHFA chief who will do principal reduction—or failing to install that person—would go a long way to answering that question.
No comments:
Post a Comment