A Galveston medical student describes life and death in the non-existent Texas safety net.
November 19, 2013
|
The following story first appeared in theTexas Observer. Check out their website for more great stories.
I
have received permission to share my patients’ stories, and changed or
omitted some names. This is a personal essay; the views are my own and
do not reflect those of St. Vincent’s House or St. Vincent’s Student-Run
Free Clinic.
The first patient who called me “doctor” died
a few winters ago. I met him at the St. Vincent’s Student-Run Free
Clinic on Galveston Island. I was a first-year medical student then, and
the disease in his body baffled me. His belly was swollen, his eyes
were yellow and his blood tests were all awry. It hurt when he swallowed
and his urine stank.
I saw him every Thursday afternoon. I would
do a physical exam, talk to him, and consult with the doctor. We ran
blood counts and wrote a prescription for an antacid—not the best
medication, but one you can get for $4 a month. His disease seemed
serious, but we couldn’t diagnose him at the free clinic because the
tests needed to do so—a CT scan, a biopsy of the liver, a test to look
for cancer cells in the fluid in his belly—are beyond our financial
reach.
He started calling me “Dr. Rachel.” When his pain got so
bad that he couldn’t eat, we decided to send him to the emergency room.
It was not an easy decision.
There’s a popular myth that the
uninsured—in Texas, that’s 25 percent of us—can always get medical care
through emergency rooms. Ted Cruz has argued that it is “much cheaper to
provide emergency care than it is to expand Medicaid,” and Rick Perry
has claimed that Texans prefer the ER system. The myth is based on a
1986 federal law called the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act
(EMTALA), which states that hospitals with emergency rooms have to
accept and stabilize patients who are in labor or who have an acute
medical condition that threatens life or limb. That word “stabilize” is
key: Hospital ERs don’t have to treat you. They just have to patch you
up to the point where you’re not actively dying. Also, hospitals charge
for ER care, and usually send patients to collections when they cannot
pay.
My patient went to the ER, but didn’t get treatment. Although
he was obviously sick, it wasn’t an emergency that threatened life or
limb. He came back to St. Vincent’s, where I went through my routine:
conversation, vital signs, physical exam. We laughed a lot, even though
we both knew it was a bad situation.
One night, a friend called to
say that my patient was in the hospital. He’d finally gotten so anemic
that he couldn’t catch his breath, and the University of Texas Medical
Branch (UTMB), where I am a student, took him in. My friend emailed me
the results of his CT scans: There was cancer in his kidney, his liver
and his lungs. It must have been spreading over the weeks that he’d been
coming into St. Vincent’s.
I went to visit him that night.
“There’s my doctor!” he called out when he saw me. I sat next to him,
and he explained that he was waiting to call his sister until they told
him whether or not the cancer was “bad.”
“It might be one of those
real treatable kinds of cancers,” he said. I nodded uncomfortably. We
talked for a while, and when I left he said, “Well now you know where I
am, so you can come visit me.”
I never came back. I
was too ashamed, and too early in my training to even recognize why I
felt that way. After all, I had done everything I could—what did I have
to feel ashamed of?
UTMB sent him to hospice, and he died at home a few months later. I read his obituary in the
Galveston County Daily News.
The
shame has stuck with me through my medical training—not only from my
first patient, but from many more. I am now a director of the free
clinic. It’s a volunteer position. I love my patients, and I love being
able to help many who need primary care: blood pressure control, pap
smears, diabetes management. We even do some specialty care. But the
free clinic is also where some people learn that there is no hope for
the chemotherapy or surgery that they need but can’t afford. When UTMB
refuses to treat them, it falls to us to tell them that they will die of
diseases that are, in fact, treatable.
St. Vincent’s is the primary care provider for
more than 2,000 patients across Southeast Texas. Our catchment area is a
strip of coastal plain strung with barrier islands. Drive inland and
you start to see live oaks; go toward the coast and the oil refineries
loom up over neighborhoods. The most polluting refinery in the nation is
here, in Texas City. Our patients are factory workers, laborers,
laid-off healthcare workers, the people behind the counters of seafood
restaurants.
Most of our patients come from Galveston and Brazoria
counties, but some drive two hours from Port Arthur or over from
Orange, near the Texas-Louisiana border, to get to us. That’s how hard
it is to see a doctor in Southeast Texas: People take a day off work to
drive two hours to a student-run clinic that can only provide basic
care.
The clinic is overseen by faculty physicians—UTMB docs—who
see every patient along with us students and prescribe medications.
These doctors are volunteers. We are not a UTMB clinic, but we depend on
UTMB, which is twenty blocks from St. Vincent’s, for training our
student volunteers, for liability insurance and for running our blood
tests and other labs. UTMB has given us grants, including one that
helped us get our electronic medical records system, and funds a
nurse-managed day clinic for the uninsured at St. Vincent’s House.
But
UTMB is no longer the state-subsidized charity hospital it used to be. The changes began before Hurricane Ike in 2008. But after the storm, UTMB administrators drastically
cut charity care and
moved clinics to the mainland, where there are more paying patients.
The old motto “Here for the Health of Texas” was replaced by “Working
together to work wonders.” Among those wonders are a new surgical tower
and a plan to capitalize on Galveston’s semi-tropical charm by
attracting wealthy
healthcare tourists from
abroad. Medical care for the poor is not, apparently, among the
wonders. Whereas UTMB accepted 77 percent of charity referrals in 2005,
it was only taking 9 percent in 2011.
UTMB ascribes these changes to
financial strain from Hurricane Ike, the county’s inability to
negotiate a suitable indigent-care contract and loss of state funding.
The state blames budget shortfalls. The Affordable Care Act, better
known as Obamacare, could have been a huge relief.
However, Gov. Rick
Perry rejected billions of dollars in federal funding to expand
Medicaid, funding that should have brought access to more than a million
Texans, including many St. Vincent’s patients.
Perry’s refusal is
catastrophic health policy. For patients, it means that seeking medical
care will still require risking bankruptcy, and may lead nowhere. For
doctors, the message was not only that our patients’ lives don’t matter,
but also that medicine—our old profession, so full of people who
genuinely want to help others—will continue to be part of the economic
machine that entrenches poverty. When the poor seek our help, they often
wind up with crippling debt.
Because they can no longer count on
UTMB to accept their patients, UTMB doctors now refer many to St.
Vincent’s. They’ll treat someone for a heart attack (because that’s an
emergency covered by EMTALA), then refer them to us for follow-up, even
though we don’t have a cardiologist. They’ll stabilize a patient after
her third stroke, put her on blood thinners and send her to us. They
once sent us, from the ER, a man with a broken arm. They put the arm in a
splint and referred him to us. What did they expect us to do—orthopedic
surgery? Put on a cast? We don’t even have an x-ray machine.
I do not think that these referrals are an official policy. Rather, they are the work of doctors and nurses trying to do
something for
patients who have been refused care through the financial screening
process at the hospital. Former St. Vincent’s leader Dr. Merle Lenihan
has described the clinic as a “moral safety valve.” It protects UTMB
from confronting the consequences of the state’s refusal to provide
care.
Among those consequences are the
deaths of the poor.
As Howard Brody, director of the Institute for the Medical Humanities,
has shown, 9,000 Texans per year will die needlessly as a result of our
failure to expand Medicaid. However, because dying patients are often
too sick, exhausted and wracked with pain to protest, UTMB and states
like Texas aren’t forced to reckon with the consequences of their policy
decisions.
Because the very sick and the dying may not be able to
speak about these issues, health-care providers—particularly the
providers of the so-called “safety net”—must do so. It is in our
clinics, in the bodies of our patients, where the consequences get
played out.
Danielle has schizophrenia, and she’s
young, and she struggles with the medications. When we talk, there are
long gaps in the conversation where, I think, she hears other voices. In
one of these gaps, I notice the sun slanting in where it’s beginning to
set beyond the ship channel. There’s gospel music streaming out over
the basketball court from the speakers mounted on the side of the
community center. I am reminded of what the director of the community
center, an Episcopal minister, believes: Every patient is a miracle. The
St. Vincent’s House motto is “An oasis of hope, expecting miracles.”
Danielle looks up and stares right at me. “Here’s what I want to know,” she says. “Why are we so poor?”
St.
Vincent’s House, which hosts the free clinic, is a historically
African-American community center in the lowest-income neighborhood on
our island, next to where the housing projects were before they were
condemned. The federal government ordered Galveston to rebuild the
public housing after Hurricane Ike, but the city refused. We elected a
mayor who ran on an explicit anti-public housing platform. Just like the
medical system, the city knows whose lives matter.
Now,
dandelions grow in the empty lots left after Ike flooded the
neighborhood. People sit on the ragged, cracking curbs, and run
wheelchairs right down the middle of the street because the sidewalks
tend to end in grassy fields or little precipices.
The community
center employs a person to stand in the street and walk us to our cars
after clinic if we want. Who is he protecting us from, I wonder. Our
patients?
In my second year of medical school, I
took a small-group course with a famously terrifying surgeon. He told us
his moral motto: “A physician never takes away hope.”
I never
figured out how that motto could guide doctors through a system where
our patients are dying from treatable diseases. Part of my job, it
seems, is precisely that: to sit down with patients and, as gently as
possible, take away hope.
Consider Vanessa and Jimmy. They met in
New Orleans when she was 18. She was working cleaning motels, and he
took her on a tour of the tugboat he was captain of. Vanessa says they
came to St. Vincent’s because the shipyard Jimmy worked for opted out of
providing insurance even for full-time employees like him. They looked
for insurance on the open market, but couldn’t afford it.
The
Affordable Care Act is supposed to help families like Vanessa and Jimmy
get insurance. Folks higher on the income scale should now be able to
afford insurance thanks to government subsidies. The poorest of the
(legally documented) poor should be covered by Medicaid. And for those
people in between, the federal government offered to pay for almost all
the costs of expanding Medicaid.
More than a million Texans—and
most St. Vincent’s patients—are somewhere in between. They are the
working poor, or they are adults without dependent children, who cannot
qualify for Medicaid in Texas, no matter how poor they are.
When
Jimmy’s labs showed a dangerously high white blood cell count, we sent
him to the ER. It was pneumonia, and there was a huge tumor underneath.
Current guidelines would recommend screening Jimmy for this kind of
cancer every year, but we have neither the equipment nor the funds to
offer screening. So it got caught late.
After Jimmy was diagnosed,
I helped Vanessa fill out the paperwork to request financial assistance
for cancer care. She wanted to know how likely UTMB was to offer her
husband assistance he needed.
In addition to only accepting 9
percent of applicants, the charity care approval process is a dark art,
and we never know who will be accepted. According to the
UTMB Charity Care policy,
the institution may consider not only a person’s income and diagnosis,
but also such vague qualities as “the history of the problem.” They also
consider whether the treatment will offer “educational benefit” to
medical students and trainees. Physicians in training have to see a
certain number of each type of case. If the programs are hitting quotas
with funded patients, patients like Jimmy are less likely to be
accepted.
The complexity and vagueness of these policies meant
that it was impossible to tell Vanessa how likely UTMB was to take her
husband. We can guess around a 10 percent chance, but we never really
know.
For patients facing cancer, this is not a hopeful answer.
Vanessa called from a hospital in
Houston in early November, distraught, asking me to help her decide
whether or not to let the doctors turn Jimmy’s breathing machine off.
She was afraid she wouldn’t be able to live with herself, no matter
which she chose. I gave her the advice I’d give a friend: that I trusted
her love for her husband and her ability to decide from a place of
love. Jimmy died late that night.
Vanessa’s request for UTMB
funding wasn’t approved. She has received a $17,000 bill from UTMB for
the visit when Jimmy went through the ER, and a $327,000 preliminary
bill from the Houston hospital.
If the Affordable Care Act had
been in effect last year, they would have been able to afford insurance,
get treatment early and avoid bankruptcy. I use stories like
theirs—cancer stories—when I am encouraging my patients to check out the
insurance exchanges.
But with Jimmy gone and Vanessa unemployed,
she now falls into the Medicaid coverage gap. I don’t know how she will
get care, if she ever needs more than St. Vincent’s can give.
My
first patient, the one who died in hospice, might have lived if his
cancer had been treated before it had spread from the kidney. But
without the Medicaid expansion, the Affordable Care Act wouldn’t help
him: As an adult with no dependent children, he wouldn’t qualify for
Medicaid now.
In a better medical system, he’d have had a chance
at a more dignified experience of illness. He wouldn’t have had to wait
for hours in a crowded free clinic, and assume the posture of
gratefulness that charity seems to require. He wouldn’t have had to be
treated in part by an earnest, but unskilled, first-year medical
student. He, like so many Texans, deserved better.
When one of our
St. Vincent’s patients gets a bad diagnosis, we start sending faxes: to
UTMB, to MD Anderson, to anywhere that might have funds to help them.
Sometimes it works out, but often it doesn’t. Sometimes I think of it as
“sending faxes into the abyss.” And sometimes I think of it as the
slow, diligent, technical way that I have of insisting that these lives
matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment