FAIR USE NOTICE

FAIR USE NOTICE

A BEAR MARKET ECONOMICS BLOG

DEDICATED TO OCCUPY AND THE ECONOMIC REVOLUTION

OCCUPY THE MARKETPLACE

FOLLOW ME ON FACEBOOK

This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. we believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml

If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates
FAIR USE NOTICE FAIR USE NOTICE: This page may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for scientific, research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Read more at: http://www.etupdates.com/fair-use-notice/#.UpzWQRL3l5M | ET. Updates

All Blogs licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

Friday, July 31, 2009

Pay for Health Care Reform by Eliminating Insurance Industry Overhead


NPR

What's The Real Cost Of Health Care?


We can cover all Americans for less than one percent of GDP. The question is can we afford to do nothing? And I would argue absolutely not. Because if we don't start changing our health care system, we're gonna spend way more than that in excess cost over time.


by Deborah Franklin

description

"Trillion-dollar-price-tag" is misleading, some say /istockphoto.com


Words matter. As Congress tries to hammer out a deal to overhaul health care, the phrase of the day is "price tag." Most estimates put the cost of the plans under consideration at more than a trillion dollars.

But as NPR's Congressional Correspondent David Welna points out, it's important for reporters writing about the plans to put all those zeros in perspective. He writes:

These are estimates that cover a ten-year period. Better to say "the cost of the plan is a trillion dollars over the next ten years" than "the plan would cost a trillion dollars", which many people (I've asked) assume is the annual price tag of a healthcare revamping.
Averaged out over a decade, a trillion dollar healthcare scheme costs $100 billion a year. That's about a 4% increase over what's currently being spent on healthcare annually, whereas $1 trillion would be a 40% increase.

(Read past the jump for other ways to think of that cost)

NPR's Julie Rovner says Len Nichols, an economist with the New America Foundation, made the same point to her recently. Nichols puts the price tag at $1.6 trillion over ten years.

That's .8 percent of GDP over those 10 years. We can cover all Americans for less than one percent of GDP. The question is can we afford to do nothing? And I would argue absolutely not. Because if we don't start changing our health care system, we're gonna spend way more than that in excess cost over time.

Of course, not everyone finds comfort in that context.

John Goodman, an economist with the National Center for Policy Analysis, oft described as the "father of health savings accounts,"said this in his a blog post yesterday:

When all is said and done, the cost is still going to be about $1.5 trillion. The only real question is: Who is going to pay that cost?

Words matter.

So, what do you think?

What *is* the best way to frame how much these plans will cost?

    No comments:

    Post a Comment